INTRODUCTION
⌅Cuba is one of the countries with the highest level of mechanization in the sugarcane harvest, in which it uses thousands of complete process machines and varied means of transportation. In recent years, the mechanized cutting system was introduced with bud cutting and cane transfer, for direct unloading to the dumper, with the use of self-tilting semi-trailers pulled by tractor, as intermediate transport, and trucks with trailers for hauling towards the dumper (Martínez et al., 2021MARTÍNEZ, R.R.; RODRÍGUEZ, O.M.; BETANCOURT, R.Y.; GONZÁLEZ, C.O.; GUILLÉN, S.S.; VIDAL, D.L.: “Cosecha de caña de azúcar en suelos arcillosos pesados con alta humedad”, Ingeniería Agrícola, 11(4): 68-74, 2021, ISSN: 2306-1545, e-ISSN: 2227-8761.).
Harvesting is one of the most important stages in sugarcane production. That is why as a process it requires a high degree of organization and coordination of all the factors involved, from the field to the tilter (López et al., 2022LÓPEZ, B.E.; SAUCEDO, L.E.; GONZÁLEZ, C.O.; HERRERA, S.M.; BETANCOURT, R.Y.: “Efectos de la cosecha mecanizada de la caña de azúcar sobre el suelo”, Revista Ciencias Técnicas Agropecuarias, 31(1), 2022, ISSN: 1010-2760, e-ISSN: 2071-0054.).
The harvest-transport process does not constitute an element that influences the production process of both cane and sugar itself, but it does determine the economy of the production process, since it is developed with the use of a set of technical means between which include harvesters and means of transportation (tractors and/or trucks with carts or trailers), which, if not rationally organized, negatively influence total production costs (Rodríguez et al., 2019RODRÍGUEZ, L.Y.; MOREJÓN, M.Y.; SOSA, G.D.; MANUEL, B.J.; MARTÍNEZ, B.O.: “Modelo de Markov para determinar la estructura racional del complejo cosecha-transporte en caña de azúcar”, Revista Ciencias Técnicas Agropecuarias, 28(1), 2019, ISSN: 1010-2760, e-ISSN: 2071-0054.).
The sugarcane harvest is a rigorous process, which requires a high degree of organization and coordination of all the factors involved in the technological process. During it, an average of 40% of the expenses dedicated to the production of cane are incurred, so maximum organization is required in all the actions it includes, from the field to the tilter (Daquinta et al., 2018DAQUINTA, G.L.A.; PÉREZ, O.C.; DE JESÚS, M.R.R.; TERRY, S.D.; FERNÁNDEZ, S.M.: “Flujograma de corte para la cosecha mecanizada de la caña de azúcar en alta humedad.”, Ingeniería Agrícola, 8(3), 2018, ISSN: 2306-1545, e-ISSN: 2227-8761.).
Castillo et al. (2021)CASTILLO, R.J.A.; ÁVALOS, C.J.L.; GONZÁLEZ, C.O.; SÁNCHEZ, V.S.; ACEVEDO, D.M.; LEÓN, S.Y.; LÓPEZ, B.E.; SALCERIO, S.R.A.; BETANCOURT, R.Y.: “Factores que influyen en el rendimiento de cosechadoras de caña de azúcar, en Villa Clara”, Ingeniería Agrícola, 11(1): 27-34, 2021, ISSN: 2306-1545, e-ISSN: 2227-8761. state that the evaluations of agricultural machines are generally carried out according to the NC 34-37 (2003)NC 34-37: Máquinas Agrícolas y Forestales, Metodología para la Evaluación Tecnológica Explotativa, Inst. Oficina Nacional de Normalización La Habana, Cuba, Norma Cubana, La Habana, Cuba, Publisher: Oficina Nacional de Normalización La Habana, Cuba, 2003., standard, according to the phototiming method, making it possible to identify the times used in the production process and define the exploitation indicators of the machines. agricultural sets and self-propelled machines (sugar cane harvesters). Within these investigations, those carried out by the following authors are mentioned: Suárez et al. (2006)SUÁREZ, P.C.; RODRÍGUEZ, L.Y.; MÁRQUEZ, L.K.: “Determinación y análisis de los principales índices de explotación de las cosechadoras de caña CAMECO”, Revista Ciencias Técnicas Agropecuarias, 15(4): 69-73, 2006, ISSN: 1010-2760, e-ISSN: 2071-0054.; Matos et al. (2010)MATOS, R.N.; GARCÍA, C.E.; GONZÁLEZ, G.J.R.: “Evaluación técnica y de explotación de las cosechadoras de caña Case-7 000”, Revista Ciencias Técnicas Agropecuarias, 19(4): 06-09, 2010, ISSN: 1010-2760, e-ISSN: 2071-0054.; Daquinta et al. (2014)DAQUINTA, G.L.A.; DOMINGUEZ, B.J.; PÉREZ, O.C.; FERNÁNDEZ, S.M.: “Indicadores técnicos y de explotación de las cosechadoras de caña de azúcar CASE-IH 7000 y 8000 en la provincia de Ciego de Ávila”, Ingeniería Agrícola, 4(3): 3-8, 2014, ISSN: 2306-1545, e-ISSN: 2227-8761.; de la Rosa et al., (2014)DE LA ROSA, A.A.A.; LEIVA, M.L.V.; POMPA, C.I.; RODRÍGUEZ, S.O.: “Valoración del proceso de cosecha mecanizada de la caña de azúcar, utilizando las cosechadoras CASE IH (A 7000) en la empresa azucarera “Arquímedes Colina Antúnez””, Ingeniería Agrícola, 4(4): 30-34, 2014, ISSN: 2306-1545, e-ISSN: 2227-8761. and others.
In the Base Business Unit (UEB), Attention to Sugar Cane Producers “Héctor Molina Riaño”, not only industrial problems have arisen, but at the same time organizational and productive problems have arisen (Rodríguez et al., 2019RODRÍGUEZ, L.Y.; MOREJÓN, M.Y.; SOSA, G.D.; MANUEL, B.J.; MARTÍNEZ, B.O.: “Modelo de Markov para determinar la estructura racional del complejo cosecha-transporte en caña de azúcar”, Revista Ciencias Técnicas Agropecuarias, 28(1), 2019, ISSN: 1010-2760, e-ISSN: 2071-0054.).
In the case of transportation, the biggest problem is defined by the high rate of transportation interruptions, where it reaches values close to 50% on average, this is due to the wait for the supply of cane, interruptions of the combine and the wait to download into the tilter (Suárez et al., 2006SUÁREZ, P.C.; RODRÍGUEZ, L.Y.; MÁRQUEZ, L.K.: “Determinación y análisis de los principales índices de explotación de las cosechadoras de caña CAMECO”, Revista Ciencias Técnicas Agropecuarias, 15(4): 69-73, 2006, ISSN: 1010-2760, e-ISSN: 2071-0054.; Matos et al., 2010MATOS, R.N.; GARCÍA, C.E.; GONZÁLEZ, G.J.R.: “Evaluación técnica y de explotación de las cosechadoras de caña Case-7 000”, Revista Ciencias Técnicas Agropecuarias, 19(4): 06-09, 2010, ISSN: 1010-2760, e-ISSN: 2071-0054.).
Taking into account the above, the objective of this work is to develop a mobile application to determine the number of means of transport, in the mechanized harvest of sugar cane, for different exploitation conditions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
⌅Characterization of the technological process, of the mechanized system of harvesting and transporting sugar cane
⌅During the cutting of the sugar cane by the harvester, a moving tractor with a self-tilting trailer moves parallel to it while it is filled. Subsequently, the moving tractor moves full to the head of the field, filling the truck and the attached trailers. to the same, where the trailer trains are formed with the truck. It is then moved to the central dump where the unloading takes place.
Methodology used for the development of the CMT application
⌅The implementation of a methodology for the preparation of the application, which involves the organization of chain processes, such as mechanized sugarcane harvesting, allows the acceleration of analyzes in the decision-making process, as is the case of organizational systems in the Agriculture. It is necessary to take into account all the variables that participate in the technological process such as: transportation distance, field performance, capacity of the means of transportation, among others, allowing possible solutions in advance.
The development of the application for determining the quantity of means of transport (DCMT), the modeling of the mechanized transport and harvest system of sugar cane was carried out, using the SMCTCA software, developed by De las Cuevas et al. (2016)DE LAS CUEVAS, M.H.R.; GÓMEZ, R.I.; HERRERA, P.M.I.; SALGUERO, S.F.: “Software para la modelación del sistema mecanizado de cosecha y transporte de caña de azúcar”, Revista Ciencias Técnicas Agropecuarias, 25(4): 81-87, 2016, ISSN: 1010-2760, e-ISSN: 2071-0054., for different exploitation conditions.
As an optimization criterion, the maximum values of the time utilization coefficient were chosen during the technological process, guaranteeing that the harvester does not stop during cutting due to lack of means of transport, that is, that the synchronization between them is the same. more rational.
With the software (SMTCA) different runs were carried out, for different operating conditions and capacities of means of transport (20 and 60 t), the behavior curves were defined, for different distances from the field to the plant tilter (5, 10 , 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 and 100 km) and eight field yields (20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 and 90 t/ha).
A battery of behavior curves was prepared for all the analyzed variants, defining the equations through a linear fit. These are the methodological basis for calculating the number of means of transport, of the CMT mobile application.
Mobile application for determining the quantity of means of transportation in the mechanized sugarcane harvesting and transportation system
⌅The CMT app was developed on the Android 6.0 platform, based on the synthesized flow diagram shown in Figure 1. According to this scheme, the number of means of transport is determined for eleven distances from the field, to the central tilter (Lx, 5 to 100 km), depending on the performance and load capacity of the selected means of transport. In addition, it provides the behavior graph of the aforementioned variables.
When opening the application by simply touching the screen on it. You directly access the Control Panel (Figure 2), which is interactive, allowing the user to link with the different parts that compose it. It contains the selection of the field yield in t/ha and the capacity of the means of transportation in the mechanized sugarcane harvesting and transportation system, using the combined CASE. Subsequently, information about the transportation distance is entered.
Click on the calculate button to determine the means of transportation for the conditions established above.
It also has a hyperlink button to transfer it to the results screen, for a specific performance, capacity of the 20 and 60 t means of transport and distances from the field to the center. (Figure 3). Presents a legend specifying the indicators used, with their units of measurement
Using the three dots in the upper right corner, you access the About screen: where the names and surnames of the authors are displayed. (Figure 4), as well as, to close the application.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
⌅With a view to carrying out an analysis of the variation experienced by the rational number of means of transport, according to the criterion of maximizing the time utilization coefficient of the harvesters, based on the CMT mobile application. We then carry out the evaluation for the CASE combine, with field yields of 50 t per hectare and means of transport of 60 t.
We can see in Figure 5 that, up to a distance of 20 km, the most rational variant, from the point of view of maximum time utilization coefficient, is the one that uses two means of transport with a total capacity of 60 t. Greater than this distance and up to 50 km, the variant that uses three means of transport is the most rational, from 50 to 80 km the variant that uses 4 means of transport and with five for distances greater than 80 and up to 100 km, between field and the collection center of the sugar mill.
This behavior is acceptable, since as the transportation distance increases, a greater number of means of transportation becomes necessary to guarantee a stable behavior of the time utilization coefficient, around 80%. Which allows stable productivity of the harvester and minimal operating expenses of the mechanized sugar cane harvesting and transportation system.
CONCLUSIONS
⌅-
The "CMT" mobile application allows defining the number of means of transport, according to the criterion of maximum coefficient of use of the time of the harvesters, in the mechanized system of harvesting and transporting sugar cane, for different exploitation conditions.
-
The application of the results of the "CMT" app makes it possible to achieve stable productivity of the combines, with minimal operating costs, with an increase in transportation distance.
-
The results of the "CMT" app allow us to define the most rational, productive and economically advantageous means of transportation variants of the mechanized sugar cane harvesting and transportation system.